Haynie v. superior court 2001 26 cal.4th 1061

Author: tzpc

August undefined, 2024

WebDec 2, 2024 · Staff stated in California, a “privilege log” serves a comparable function as a Vaughn Index, but the Public Records Act does not require that an agency create a … WebJul 15, 2008 · It was determined that under the State's Public Records Act, investigatory materials produced by a local police agency were exempt from disclosure and warranted …

HAYNIE v. County of Los Angeles, Real Party in Interest. (2001)

WebSuperior Court, supra, 10 Cal.App.4th at p. 1193.) The burdens and risks of such a requirement appear substantial. Requiring a public agency to provide a list of all records … WebOct 1, 2001 · Supreme Court of California. Elgin HAYNIE, Petitioner, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of Los Angeles County, Respondent; County of Los Angeles, Real Party in … road battle

Haynie v. Superior Court (County of Los Angeles) (2001)

WebJul 4, 2024 · Superior Court (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 1099.) This exemption applies not only to documents generated by the agency, but also to records gathered from other sources. (See Haynie v. Superior Court (2001) 26 Cal.4th 1061.) This exemption continues to apply even if the case is complete and the investigation closed. (See Rivero v. WebA local agency has no duty to create a record that does not exist at the time of the request (Gov. Code, § 6252, subd. (e); Haynie v. Superior Court (2001) 26 Cal.4th 1061, 1075). WebSuperior Court (2001) 26 Cal.4th 1061, 1071 ( Haynie )), we likewise conclude the exemption applies to records generated by the ALPR system in the course of scanning … snapchat instagram und co

State of California BILL LOCKYER September 20, 2006 BILL …

WebSuperior Court (2000) 81 Cal. App. 4th 1119, 1125; 73 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 236, 237 (1990).) The purpose of Penal Code sections 13300-13305, on the other hand, is to Web(Haynie v. Superior Court (2001) 26 Cal.4th 1061, 1064 [recognizing certain CPRA exemptions “for reasons of priva cy, safety, and efficient governmental operation”].) We … snapchat interviewWebThe Haynie family name was found in the USA, the UK, Canada, and Scotland between 1840 and 1920. The most Haynie families were found in USA in 1880. In 1840 there … snapchat instant messaging android

"WebOct 1, 2001 · HAYNIE v. SUPERIOR COURT. BAXTER, J. The premise of the California Public Records Act (Gov. Code, § 6250 et seq.; hereafter CPRA) is that "access to … " - Haynie v. superior court 2001 26 cal.4th 1061

Haynie v. superior court 2001 26 cal.4th 1061

WebRackauckas v. Super. Ct., California Court of Appeals 2002 WebFeb 4, 2009 · Superior Court(2001) 26 Cal.4th 1061, 1070-1071[ 112 Cal.Rptr.2d 80, 31 P.3d 760] ( Haynie); Rackauckas, supra, 104 Cal.App.4th at pp. 175-177; Williams v. Superior Court(1993) 5 Cal.4th 337, 354, 355[ 19 Cal.Rptr.2d 882, 852 P.2d 377] ( …

Did you know?

WebApr 15, 2009 · The Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeal’s judgment on October 1, 2001, finding that the records requested were exempt from a CPRA request under the … WebDec 9, 2002 · (Haynie v. Superior Court (2001) 26 Cal.4th 1061, 1064, 112 Cal.Rptr.2d 80, 31 P.3d 760 [recognizing certain CPRA exemptions “for reasons of privacy, safety, and efficient governmental operation”].) We review de novo the trial court's ruling, but defer to its determination of any express or implied factual findings.

WebOct 1, 2001 · Superior Court, 31 P.3d 760, 112 Cal. Rptr. 2d 80, 26 Cal. 4th 1061 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open … WebDec 9, 2002 · (Haynie v. Superior Court (2001) 26 Cal.4th 1061, 1064, 112 Cal.Rptr.2d 80, 31 P.3d 760 [recognizing certain CPRA exemptions "for reasons of privacy, safety, and efficient governmental operation"].) We review de novo the trial court's ruling, but defer to its determination of any express or implied factual findings.

WebJan 16, 2015 · In construing such disclosure requests, the policy of the CPRA requires the courts to consider the information that is being requested, not only the precise type of records that must be provided. (Haynie v. Superior Court (2001) 26 Cal.4th 1061, 1072 (Haynie ); Williams v. Superior Court (1993) 5 Cal.4th 337, 348–349 (Williams ).) WebElgin HAYNIE, Petitioner, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of Los Angeles County, Respondent; County of Los Angeles, Real Party in Interest. No. B137707. Decided: May 02, 2000 Adam Axelrad, Robert Mann and Donald W. Cook, Los Angeles, for …

WebOct 6, 2024 · Subject: California Public Records Act Request: Hate Crime Data (2010-2024) (Fresno Police Department) Portal To Whom It May Concern: Pursuant to the California Public Records Act, I hereby request the following records: Information on all hate crimes occuring in the city of jurisdiction from January 1, 2010 to December 31, …

WebThe trial court ordered the Agency to produce “an index identifying the author, recipient (if any), general subject matter of the document, and the nature of the exemption claimed” to justify withholding information in response to a request for … road beamWebJun 3, 2024 · Superior Court (2001) 26 Cal.4th 1061, 1075.) In response to your Request No. 5, this request is overly broad. A PRA request must be focused and specific and must reasonably describe an identifiable record or records. (Rogers v. Superior Court (1993) 19 Cal.App.4th 469, 481; Gov. Code § 6253 (b).) snapchat in the browserWebMar 30, 2024 · SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO. DATE/TIME: JUDGE: March 25, 2024 2:00 p.m. ... (2024) 26 Cal.App.5th 651 , 669.) … snapchat internetWebTITLE 1 - GENERAL DIVISION 10 - ACCESS TO PUBLIC RECORDS PART 5 - SPECIFIC TYPES OF PUBLIC RECORDS CHAPTER 1 - Crimes, Weapons, and Law Enforcement … snapchat internship summer 2023WebEarly Notables of the Haynie family (pre 1700) More information is included under the topic Early Haynie Notables in all our PDF Extended History products and printed products … road bay beach anguillaWebexemption beyond prior precedent as established by this Court in Williams v. Superior Court, 5 Cal. 4th 337 (1993) and Haynie v. Superior Court, 26 Cal. 4th 1061 (2001), and so … road battle mapWebOct 24, 2024 · Superior Court (2001) 26 Cal.4th 1061, 1069-1070). Additionally, the exemption for investigatory records and files extends indefinitely, even after an investigation is closed (Williams v. Superior Court (1993) 5 Cal.4th 337, 355-361; Rackauckas v. Superior Court (2002) 104 Cal.App.4th 169; Rivero v. Superior Court (1997) 54 … snapchat in the web