Theoretical paper's referee report
Webb20 aug. 2024 · Sorted by: 16. Resoundingly, yes. At least in my field (number theory). I just looked at the 15 most recent referee reports I received, and only 1 out of 15 of these reports avoided writing in the first person. Note: I restricted to reports on initial submissions to avoid obvious duplication of referee styles. WebbThe referee should show restraint when asking for new material and, indeed, make suggestions for how the paper can be made shorter and more focused. It is important …
Theoretical paper's referee report
Did you know?
WebbWriting a Helpful Referee's Report Authors: Brian Martin University of Wollongong Abstract Referees' reports are often demoralizing to authors. It is possible to write a report that is... WebbThus, a referee report should contain a scientifically based argument that explains the referee’s assessment of the importance of the work and details the consider-ations that …
WebbThe report for the authors should contain a reasonable rationale for your view of the paper as judged against the criteria above. It should be written constructively and politely but … WebbThere will be two referee reports. This rst report is due February 15th at 5pm. The paper you will be reviewing for this report is \The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation" by Acemoglu, Johnson and Robinson. The second report is due March 29th at 5pm. The paper you will review for the second report is ...
WebbThe referee report A good referee report should have sev-eral parts. First, you should briefly state your recommendation and the reasons for it. Second, you should summarize the point of the paper in one to five sentences, both for the editor™s use and to ensure that you actually understand the paper. Third, you should evaluate the validity ... WebbTheoretical Computer Science is mathematical and abstract in spirit, but it derives its motivation from practical and everyday computation. All papers introducing or studying mathematical, logic and formal concepts and methods are welcome, provided that their motivation is clearly drawn from the field of computing.
WebbHow to Write an Effective Referee Report and Improve the Scientific Review Process by Jonathan B. Berk, Campbell R. Harvey and David Hirshleifer. Published in volume 31, …
Webb17 nov. 2024 · Editing referees' reports As part of our editorial policies, we do not edit reviewer reports and any comments that were intended for the authors are transmitted, … how to store macros in excelWebbIf the length is not excessive, the paper is given to the appropriate editor who chooses referees for the paper. (The editors divide responsibility among themselves for the different areas of physics.) If the paper is estimated to exceed 3750 words, the paper is not sent for review, and a length estimate is sent to the authors. how to store macaroniWebbGuidelines for Referees; Annual Reports; Best Paper Awards; Theoretical Economics. TE Online; Open access; Editorial standards; Referee guidelines; Submissions; Turnaround; … how to store macaroni long termWebb17 nov. 2024 · Referee instructions Journal aims and scope Criteria for publication The review process Selecting referees Writing the review Elements of a reviewer report Confidentiality Timing Anonymity... read-write webWebbEach paper submitted to the journal is delegated to an Editor, who selects referees and asks them to report on its merits and shortcomings. Referees are typically selected on the basis of expertise, ability, and performance. The Editor decides, based on his or her professional experience and the referees’ reports, whether to accept the paper. read. csvWebbAcademic papers are usually sent to academic journals for publication. Once she receives a paper, the editor of a journal consults an external scholar (more commonly called “referee”) to see if the paper is suitable for publication. The referee reads the papers and writes a referee report. how to store magazines in bindersWebbYour report, along with that of any other referees, will be seen by the journal Editors. They will assess the referee reports and make a decision on how to proceed. If the referee reports agree, the decision will be made to either: • accept the paper without any amendments • ask the authors to revise the paper • reject the paper read-write transaction